Burt's objections to consciousness as cybernetics are considered, and the cybernetic versions of Place and Taylor are assessed. Concepts of consciousness as a reactive emergent entity and an overlying nervous system are noticed. In Roberts' version basic states or objects, the self, and relations of self to states or objects are the experiential parts of consciousness, and are cybernetically identifiable. Gradable organizations of these parts are, while in immediate memory process, conscious experiences. The generic term consciousness, meaning subjective being of something, is “something” in immediate memory process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongD. M.A materialist theory of the mind. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968.
2.
BurtC.Brain and consciousness. British Journal of Psychology, 1968, 59, 55–69.
3.
EcclesJ. C. (Ed.) Brain and conscious experience. New York: Springer, 1965.
4.
PlaceU. T.Burt on brain and consciousness. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1969, 22, 285–292.
5.
PribramK. H.The neurophysiology of remembering. Scientific American, 1969, 220(1), 73–86.
6.
RobertsH.Consciousness in animals and automata. Psychological Reports, 1968, 22, 1226–1228.
7.
SluckinW.Minds and machines. Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin Pelican, 1960.
8.
SperryR. W.An objective approach to subjective experience: further explanation of a hypothesis. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 585–590.
9.
TaylorJ. G.Consciousness: theory versus non-theory. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1970, 23, 43–46.
