Abstract
A recent study by Heap, Boblitt, Moore, and Hord (1970), comparing the combined effects of token economy, milieu, and attitude therapies with a no-treatment chronic ward control group, is criticized because of several methodological deficiencies: confounding of several treatment modalities, incomparable living arrangements for experimentals and controls, and the absence of an “attention-placebo” control group. An alternative experimental design is offered and suggestions for further research employing token economic methods are outlined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
