In order to test an interpretation of the overlearning reversal effect, 2 groups of rats were given acquisition and reversal training on a simultaneous discrimination using 50% or 100% reinforcement. No difference in position responding was observed during reversal, and this result was construed as disconfirming the hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DennyM. R.The role of secondary reinforcement in a partial reinforcement learning situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1946, 36, 373–389.
2.
ErlebacherA.Reversal learning in rats as a function of percentage of reinforcement and degree of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 84–90.
3.
GrosslightJ. H.HallJ. F.ScottW.Reinforcement schedules in habit reversal: a confirmation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 48, 173–174.
4.
MandlerJ. M.HooperW. R.Overtraining and goal approach strategies in discrimination reversal. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 19, 142–149.
5.
ReidL. S.The development of non-continuity behavior through continuity learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953, 46, 107–112.
6.
StanleyJ. C.Jr.The differential effects of partial and continuous reward upon the acquisition and elimination of a running response in a two choice situation. Unpublished Ed.D. thesis, Harvard Univer., 1950.
