An attempt is made to find an answer to Lord's parable of the “football numbers” by demonstrating that he ignored the well known principle that a measurement operation should be consistent over allowable transformations of scale. An example is given to demonstrate that two allowable transformations of nominal scale data may lead to different statistical results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsE. W.FagotR. F.RobinsonR. E.A theory of appropriate statistics. Psychometrika, 1965, 30, 99–127.
2.
BurkeC. J.Additive scales and statistics. Psychological Review, 1953, 60, 73–75.
3.
BurkeC. J.Measurement scales and statistical models. In MarxM. H. (Ed.), Theories in contemporary psychology. New York: Macmillan, 1963. Pp. 147–159.
4.
LordF. M.On the statistical treatment of football numbers. American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 750–751.
5.
LordF. M.Further comment on “football numbers.”American Psychologist, 1954, 9, 264–265.
6.
StevensS. S.Mathematical measurement and psychophysics. In StevensS. S. (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychologyNew York: Wiley, 1951. Pp. 1–50.
7.
SuppesP.ZinnesJ. L.Basic measurement theory. In LuceR. D.BushR. R.GlantersE. (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley, 1963. Pp. 1–76.
8.
ZinnesJ.Scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 1969, 20, 447–474.
