From a larger group of 425 delinquents, 60 were classified as neurotic or psychopathic by test scores and conditioned in one of three ways for use of the pronoun “they.” Neurotics conditioned significantly better for the verbal reinforcer “good” than for a buzzer which had no meaning assigned to it. In the buzzer-without-meaning group, neuroticism scores correlated positively with conditioning, while psychopathy scores correlated negatively with conditioning (ps < .01).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BryanJ.KapcheR.Psychopathy and verbal conditioning. J. abnorm. Psychol., 1967, 72, 71–73.
2.
DeNikeL. D.The temporal relationship of awareness and performance in verbal conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., 1964, 68, 521–529.
3.
JohnsJ.QuayH. C.The effect of social reward on verbal conditioning in psychopathic and neurotic military offenders. J. consult. Psychol., 1962, 26, 217–220.
4.
PersonsR. W.Verbal operant conditioning of severely antisocial adolescents by delinquent and normal experimenters. Psychol. Rep., 1968, 22, 745–748.
5.
PetersonD. R.QuayH. C.CameronG. R.Personality and background factors in juvenile delinquency as inferred from questionnaire responses. J. consult. Psychol., 1959, 23, 395–399.
6.
PetersonD. R.QuayH. C.TiffanyT. L.Personality factors related to juvenile delinquency. Child Develpm., 1961, 32, 355–372.
7.
QuayH. C.HuntW. A.Psychopathy, neuroticism and verbal conditioning: A replication and extension. J. consult. Psychol., 1965, 29, 283.