It was predicted that retroactive inhibition could be produced using meaningful passages of prose. In addition, it was hypothesized that if the interpolated session took place in a context which was markedly different from the room used during original learning, the amount of retroactive inhibition would be less. Also, if there was a contextual change between the original learning and the recall session, retention would be less. A passage describing Jim as an extravert was first presented, followed by one describing him as an introvert. A classroom and cafeteria served as contrasting contexts. The hypotheses were confirmed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbernathyE. M.The effect of changed environmental conditions upon results of college examinations. Journal of Psychology, 1940, 10, 293–301.
2.
AusubelD.The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Bur. of Educ. Res., Univer. of Illinois, 1963.
3.
AusubelD.RobbinsL.BlakeE.Jr.Retroactive inhibition and facilitation in the learning of school materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1957, 48, 334–343.
4.
AusubelD. P.StagerM.GaiteA. J.Proactive effects in meaningful verbal learning and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969, 60, 59–64.
5.
AusubelD. P.StagerM.GaiteA. J.Retroactive facilitation in meaningful verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1968, 59, 250–255.
6.
BilodeauI. M.SchlosbergH.Similarity in stimulating conditions as a variable in retroactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951, 41, 199–204.
7.
BirnbaumI. M.Context stimuli in verbal learning and the persistence of associative factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 71, 483–487.
8.
CarrH. A.Maze studies with the white rat: I. Normal animals; II. Blind animals; III. Anosmic animals. Journal of Animal Behavior, 1917, 7, 259–275, 277–294, 295–306.
9.
DeeseJ.HardmanG. W.Jr.An analysis of errors in retroactive inhibition of rote verbal learning. American Journal of Psychology, 1954, 67, 299–307.
10.
DulskyS. G.The effect of a change of background on recall and relearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, 18, 725–740.
11.
FarnsworthP. R.Examinations in familiar and unfamiliar surroundings. Journal of Social Psychology, 1934, 5, 128–129.
12.
FarnsworthP. R.Continued training with omission of certain Nebenreize. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1937, 50, 277–282.
13.
GreenspoonJ.RanyardR.Stimulus conditions and retroactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 53, 55–59.
14.
HallJ. F.Retroactive inhibition in meaningful material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1955, 46, 47–52.
15.
JensenL. C.AndersonD. C.The effects of specific environmental stimuli on forgetting. Denver: Regional Office of Education, 1969. (Technical report)
16.
LuchinsA. S.Definitiveness of impression and primacy-recency in communications. Journal of Social Psychology, 1958, 48, 275–290.
17.
McGeochJ. A.McKinneyF.The susceptibility of prose to retroactive inhibition. American Journal of Psychology, 1934, 46, 429–436.
18.
McGeochJ. A.UnderwoodB. J.Tests of the two-factor theory of retroactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1943, 32, 1–16.
NaggeK. W.An experimental test of the theory of associative interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, 18, 663–682.
21.
PanS.The influence of context upon recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1926, 9, 468–491.
22.
PessinJ.The effect of similar and dissimilar conditions upon learning and relearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1932, 15, 427–435.
23.
PostmanL.The present status of the interference theory. In CoferC. N. (Ed.), Verbal learning and verbal behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961. Pp. 152–179.
24.
ReedH. J.The influence of a change of conditions upon the amount recalled. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1931, 14, 632–649.
25.
SaltzE.Compound stimuli in verbal learning: Cognitive and sensory differentiation versus stimulus selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 1–5.
26.
SchuellT. J.HapkiewiezW. G.Similarity and retroaction in prose material. Paper read at American Education Research Association, Los Angeles, California, February, 1969.
27.
SlameckaN. J.Studies in retention of connected discourse. American Journal of Psychology, 1959, 72, 409–416.
28.
SlameckaN. J.Retroactive inhibition of connected discourse as a function of practice level. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 60, 245–249.
29.
SlameckaN. J.Retention of connected discourse as a function of duration of interpolated learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962, 63, 480–486.
30.
SmithE.GuthrieE.Genetic psychology in terms of behavior. New York: Harper, 1921.
31.
UnderwoodB. J.Interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 49–60.
32.
WatsonJ. B.Kinesthetic and organic sensations: Their role in the reactions of the white rat to the maze. Psychological Monographs, 1907, 8, No. 3 (Whole No. 33).
33.
WeissW.MargoliusG.The effect of context stimuli on learning and retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 48, 318–322.
