A stressful film was shown twice to 39 psychiatric patients divided into 3 groups on the basis of their R-S scores. Skin conductance was monitored during the films and an adjective check list completed after each film. Differences among groups fell just short of statistical significance on both stress measures. The effects of the repression-sensitization personality dimension do not seem to account for as large a part of the variability in psychiatric patients' ability to cope with stress as they do in studies using normal Ss.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ByrneD.The repression-sensitization scale: Rationale, reliability, and validity. Journal of Personality, 1961, 29, 334–349.
2.
ByrneD.Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In MaherB. A. (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research. Vol. I. New York: Academic Press, 1964. Pp. 169–220.
GoldsteinM. J.JonesR. B.ClemensT. L.FlaggG. W.AlexanderF. G.Coping style as a factor in psychophysiological response to a tension-arousing film. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 290–302.
5.
LazarusR. S.Emotions and adaptation: Conceptual and empirical relations. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1968. Lincoln, Neb.: Univer. of Nebraska Press, 1968. Pp. 175–266.
6.
LazarusR. S.AlfertE.Short-circuiting of threat by experimentally altering cognitive appraisal. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 195–205.
7.
LazarusR. S.OptonE. M.NomikosM. S.Jr.RankinN. O.The principle of short-circuiting of threat: Further evidence. Journal of Personality, 1965, 33, 622–635.
8.
SpeismanJ. C.LazarusR. S.MordkoffA.DavisonL.Experimental reduction of stress based on ego-defense theory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 367–380.
9.
ZuckermanM.The development of an affect adjective check list for the measurement of anxiety. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960, 24, 457–462.
