Student responses to generalized and “bona fide” personality interpretations were explored in 2 experiments. The “fake” generalized interpretation was significantly preferred and more highly rated than interpretations based on 120 Ss' actual test scores. Explanations and consequences of these findings were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ForerS. R.The fallacy of personal validations: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1949, 44, 118–123.
2.
JacksonD. N.Personality research form manual. Goshen, N. Y.: Research Psychologists Press, Inc., 1967.
SundbergN. D.Th acceptability of “fake” versus “bona fide” personality test interpretations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 50, 145–147.
