An alternative explanation of the extreme resistance to extinction common to operant avoidance paradigms is described. It is felt some inconsistencies in Eysenck's interpretation can be avoided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AscoughJ. C.SipprelleC. N.Operant verbal conditioning of autonomic responses. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1968, 6, 365–370.
2.
EysenckH. J.Single-trial conditioning, neurosis, and the Napalkov phenomenon. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1967, 5, 63–65.
3.
EysenckH. J.A theory of the incubation of anxiety/fear responses. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1968, 6, 309–321.
4.
NapalkovA. V.Information process of the brain. In WeinerN.SefadeJ. C. (Eds.), Progress of brain research. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1963. Pp. 59–69.
5.
SenterR. J.HummelW. F.Suppression of an autonomic response through operant conditioning. Psychological Record, 1965, 15, 1–5.
