Female Ss were deceived—a confederate tried to influence their opinions—debriefed, and then sworn to secrecy. They were then contacted, either immediately after the experiment or by telephone several days later, by a second confederate who attempted to elicit information about the experiment. Six of 36 female Ss in the immediate interview and 15 of 19 in the telephone interview disclosed “secret” information. The implications of the data for deception experiments are discussed.
AronsonE.Avoidance of inter-subject communication. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 238.
3.
GoldingS. G.LichtensteinE.Confession of awareness and prior knowledge of deception as a function of interview set and approval motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press.
4.
KelmanH. C.The problem of deception in social psychological experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 1–11.
5.
RokeachM.ZemachR.NorrellG.The pledge to secrecy; a method to assess violations. Paper presented at the1966 meetings of the American Psychological Association.
6.
RosenthalR.KohnP.GreenfieldP. M.CarotaN.Data desirability, experimenter expectancy, and the results of psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 20–27.
7.
SchultzD. P.The human subject in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 214–228.
