Abstract
The present study investigated performance on AB-AB' and AB-ABr paradigm items under mixed list (ML) and unmixed list (UL) conditions. In ML 2 different subsets of second-list items each represented a different type of paradigm, while in UL second-list pairs were homogeneous with respect to type of paradigm. 4 groups of 24 Ss each learned 2 lists of 2-syllable adjectives. First-list items were arranged so as to provide AB-AB' UL, AB-ABr UL and 2 ML conditions. Number of correct responses and trials to criterion measures showed markedly superior performance on AB-ABr items under ML. Early training performance was significantly better for AB-AB' pairs under UL than under ML. The results were viewed as inconsistent with predictions based on a priori assumptions concerning the use of cognitive mediational strategies in transfer tasks. The possible influence of intralist associative factors in ML vs UL transfer effects was discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
