90 Ss were given 5 measures of divergent production and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. As very few of the correlations were significant, it may be concluded that there is no correspondence across the cognitive and personality referents of creativity examined here.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FrenchJ. W.EkstromR. B.PriceL. A.Manual for Kit of Reference Tests for Cognitive Factors, Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1963.
2.
GuilfordJ. P.MerrifieldP. R.The structure of intellect model: Its uses and implications. Reports From the Psychological Laboratory, University of Southern California, 1960, No. 24.
3.
MacKinnonD. W.The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 484–495.
4.
MacKinnonD. W.Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 1965, 20, 273–281.
5.
MyersI. B.The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1962.
6.
OhnmachtF. W.Relationships among personality and cognitive referents of creativity. Psychological Reports, 1967, 20, 1331–1334.
7.
StrickerL. J.RossJ.Intercorrelations and reliability of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Scales. Psychological Reports, 1963, 12, 287–293.
8.
StrickerL. J.RossJ.An assessment of some structural properties of the Jungian personality typology. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 62–71.
