Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A category-scaling technique was used to obtain familiarity scale values for 420 nouns. The judges were instructed to base their ratings of familiarity on exposure frequency. The nouns were selected with random numbers from word pools of approximately equal sizes in the Thorndike-Lorge (T-L) source with control of word length and syllabification. 12 sets of words, with 35 words in each set, were scaled. The word sets were formed from words in three T-L frequency categories (.22 < 1, 1–4, and 5–100+ words per million) and four conceptual categories (names of animals, persons, occupations and articles of dress). Correlation coefficients which ranged from .68 to .95 were obtained between scale values having frequency-specific anchors and scale values with anchors which were not specific to the frequency categories. Indices of internal consistency show that empirical cumulative rating proportions were predicted from normal-theory cumulative proportions with an average error of .016.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bousfield

W. A.

The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. J. gen. Psychol., 1953, 49, 229–240.

Bousfield

W. A.

Cohen

B. H.

The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged words of different frequencies-of-usage. J. gen. Psychol., 1955, 52, 83–95.

Bousfield

W. A.

Cohen

B. H.

Clustering in recall as a function of the number of word-categories in stimulus-word lists. J. gen. Psychol., 1956, 54, 95–106.

Cofer

C. N.

Some factors in the organizational characteristics of free recall. Amer. Psychologist, 1965, 20, 261–272.

Cofer

C. N.

Musgrave

B. S.

, (Eds.) Verbal behavior and learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.

Deese

Frequency of usage and number of words in free recall: the role of association. Psychol. Rep., 1960, 7, 337–344.

Guilford

J. P.

Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.

Haagen

C. H.

Synonymity, vividness, familiarity, and association value ratings of 400 pairs of common adjectives. J. Psychol., 1949, 27, 453–463.

Hall

J. F.

Relationships among a number of measures of meaningfulness. Amer. J. Psychol., 1967, 80, 291–293.

10.

Marshall

G. R.

Cofer

C. N.

Associative, category, and set factors in clustering among word pairs and triads. Tech. Rep. No. 4, July, 1961, New York Univer., Contract NONR 285 (47). (a)

11.

Marshall

G. R.

Cofer

C. N.

Kinds of categories and clustering in free recall. Tech. Rep. No. 5, July, 1961, New York Univer., Contract NONR 285 (47). (b)

12.

Mosier

C. I.

A modification of the method of successive intervals. Psychometrika, 1940, 5, 101–107.

13.

Noble

C. E.

The meaning-familiarity relationship. Psychol. Rev., 1953, 60, 89–98.

14.

Noble

C. E.

The familiarity-frequency relationship. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 13–16.

15.

Noble

C. E.

Meaningfulness and familiarity. In Cofer

C. N.

Musgrave

B. S.

(Eds.), Verbal behavior and learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 76–119.

16.

Paivio

A. A.

A factor-analytic study of word attributes and verbal learning. J. verb. Learn, verb. Behav., 1968, 7, 41–49.

17.

Thorndike

E. L.

Lorge

The teacher's word hook of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia Univer., 1944.

18.

Torgerson

W. S.

Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.

19.

Underwood

B. J.

Schulz

R. W.

Meaningfulness and verbal learning. New York: Lippincott, 1960.

20.

Walder

Clustering in recall as a function of the rated familiarity of the stimulus words. Unpublished Master's thesis, Kent State Univer., 1962.

21.

Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language. Springfield: G. & C. Merriam, 1967.

22.

Wood

Category names as cues for the recall of category instances. Psychon. Sci., 1967, 9, 323–324. Accepted October 20, 1969.

Familiarity Scale Values for 420 Nouns in Twelve Combinations of Frequency of Occurrence and Conceptual Categorization

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References