Recent findings suggesting that an animal's initial response to novel objects is one of avoidance casts doubt on explanations of exploratory behavior as a separate drive. The hypothesis was developed that exploratory activity is a learned response to novelty. 60 male hooded rats were subjected to various deprivation and reinforcement conditions in an open-field apparatus. The results support the hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnettS. A.A study in behavior. London: Metheun, 1963.
2.
BerlyneD. E.The arousal and satiation of perceptual curiosity in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1955, 48, 238–246.
3.
BerlyneD. E.KoenigI. D. V.HirotaT.Novelty, arousal, and the reinforcement of diverse exploration in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966, 62, 222–226.
4.
BindraD.PalfaiT.Nature of positive and negative incentive-motivational effects on general activity. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1967, 63, 288–297.
5.
BindraD.SpinnerN.Response to different degrees of novelty: The incidence of various activities. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1958, 1, 341–350.
6.
BronsonG. W.The fear of novelty. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 350–358.
7.
CandlandD. K.MilneD.Species differences in approach behavior as a function of developmental environment. Animal Behavior, 1966, 14, 539–545.
8.
De NelskyG. L.DennenbergV. H.Infantile stimulation and adult exploratory behavior: Effects of handling upon tactual variation seeking. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1967, 63, 309–312.
9.
DemberW. N.EarlR. W.Analysis of exploration, manipulatory, and curiosity behavior. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 91–96.
GlickmanS. E.SchiffB.A biological theory of reinforcement. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 81–109.
13.
GlickmanS. E.ScogesR. W.Curiosity in zoo animals. Behaviour, 1966, 26, 151–188.
14.
HughesR. N.Behavior of male and female rats with free choice of two environments differing in novelty. Animal Behavior, 1968, 16, 92–96.
15.
KingD. L.A review and interpretation of some aspects of infant-mother relationship in mammals and birds. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 65, 143–155.
16.
LeckartB. T.BennettK. S.Reinforcement effects of food and stimulus novelty. Psychological Record, 1968, 18, 253–260.
17.
LesterD.Sex differences in exploration of a familiar locale. Psychological Record, 1967, 17, 63–64.
18.
MeyerD. R.TreichlerF. R.MeyerP. M.Discrete-trial training techniques and stimulus variables. In SchrierA. M.HarlowH. F.StollnitzF. (Eds.), Behavior of non-human primates. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Vol. I. Pp%. 1–50.
19.
MontgomeryK. C.Exploratory behavior as a function of “similarity” of stimulus situations. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1953, 46, 129–133.
20.
MontgomeryK. C.The relations between fear induced by novel stimulation and exploratory behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1955, 48, 132–136.
21.
RodgersW. L.Specificity of specific hungers. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1967, 64, 49–58.
22.
RozinP.Specific aversions as a component of specific hungers. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1967, 64, 237–242.
23.
SchneirlaT. C.Aspects of stimulation and organization in approach/withdrawal processes underlying vertebrate behavioral development. In LehrmanD. S.HindeR. A.ShawE. (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Vol. 1. Pp%. 1–74.
24.
SteinL.Habituation and stimulus novelty: A model based on classical conditioning. Psychological Review, 1966, 73, 352–356.
25.
SteinmanF.Retention of alley brightness in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1967, 64, 105–109.
