In a study of the relationship between pathology and rating style, 68 Ss rated 10 Rorschach inkblots on 15 semantic differential scales. Ss were selected from a total of 158 Japanese college students as extreme neuroticism and/or extraversion scorers based on the Japanese version of the Maudsley Personality Inventory. It was found that neurotics made significantly more extreme ratings than non-neurotic Ss and that stable introverts had significantly fewer extreme ratings than neurotic extraverts. No significant differences were found in intermediate and neutral ratings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArthurA. Z.Response bias in the semantic differential. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1966, 5, 103–107.
2.
CronbachL. J.Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1946, 6, 475–494.
3.
CronbachL. J.Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1950, 10, 3–31.
4.
EysenckH. J.The questionnaire measurement of neuroticism and extraversion. Revista di Psychologia, 1956, 50, 113–140.
5.
EysenckH. J.The Maudsley Personality Inventory. London: Univer. of London Press, 1959.
6.
EysenckH. J.Pact and fiction in psychology. London: Penguin Books, 1965.
7.
EysenckS. B. C.EysenckH. J.On the dual nature of extraversion. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1963, 2, 46–55.
8.
LewisN. A.TaylorJ. A.Anxiety and extreme response preferences. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1955, 15, 111–116.
9.
LightC. S.ZaxM.GardinerD. H.Relationship of age, sex, and intelligence level to extreme response style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 907–909.
10.
O'DonovanD.Rating extremity: Pathology or meaningfulness?Psychological Review, 1965, 72, 358–372.
11.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana: Univer. of Illinois Press, 1957.
12.
SchutzR. E.FosterR. J.A factor analytic study of acquiescent and extreme response set. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1963, 23, 435–447.
13.
SoueifM. I.Extreme response sets as a measure of intolerance of ambiguity. British Journal of Psychology, 1958, 49, 329–334.
14.
ZaxM.GardinerD. H.LowyD. G.Extreme response tendency as a function of emotional adjustment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 654–657.
