The hypothesis that running in activity wheels competes with feeding and thereby accounts for the estrous Variation in food intake was tested by comparing the food intake of 16 rats given access to wheels and 16 rats not given access to wheels. Contrary to the prediction the estrous variation in food intake appeared in all rats in both conditions. Running did not affect growth in body weight and increased food intake during estrus as well as diestrus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aschkenasy-LeluP.AschkenasyA.Effects of androgens and oestrogens on the metabolism of proteins and the growth of tissues. In BourneG. H. (Ed.), World review of nutrition and dietetics. London: Pitman Med. Publ. Co., 1959. Pp. 33–55.
2.
BrobeckJ. R.WheatlandM.StromingerJ. L.Variations in regulation of energy exchange associated with estrus, diestrus, and pseudopregnancy in rats. Endocrinology, 1947, 40, 65–72.
3.
CalhounJ. B.The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat. Bethesda: U. S. Dept of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 1961. (Pub. Hlth Serv. Publ. 1008)
4.
FingerF. W.Estrous activity as a function of measuring device. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1961, 54, 524–525.
5.
PremackD. M.PremackA. J.Increased eating in rats deprived of running. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1963, 6, 209–212.
6.
RichardsM. P. M.Activity measured by running wheels and observation during the oestrous cycle, pregnancy, pseudopregnancy in the golden hamster. Anim. Behav., 1966, 14, 450–458.
