Sattler's and Valett's item-classification schemes for the Stanford-Binet were applied to data obtained from a sample of 80 retarded children. The correlations between the categories in the two schemes indicated that the schemes have a great deal in common. Ss appeared relatively strong in Language (Vocabulary and Verbal Fluency) and Reasoning (Judgment and Reasoning), but the items which they passed in these categories deal with verbal expression and visual discrimination of the simplest sort.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
McQuittyL. L.Elementary linkage analysis for isolating orthogonal and oblique types and typal relevancies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1957, 17, 207–229.
2.
SattlerJ. M.Analysis of functions of the 1960 Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Form L-M. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1965, 21, 173–179.
3.
SilversteinA. B.Comparison of two item-classification schemes for the Stanford-Binet. Psychological Reports, 1965, 17, 964.
4.
TermAn L. M.MerrillM. A.Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Manual for the third revision, form L-M. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1960.
5.
ValettR. E.A clinical profile for the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale (L-M). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1965.
