It is contended that only some of Levy's criticisms are appropriate to the studies reviewed. Others reflect a misconception of the purpose and function of studies on WAIS short-forms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HolmesD. S.ArmstrongH. E.Jr.JohnsonM. H.RiesH. A.Validity and clinical utility of the Satz and Mogel abbreviated form of the WAIS. Psychological Reports, 1966, 18, 992–994.
2.
LevyP.Short-form tests: a methodological review. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 410–416.
3.
SundbergN. D.The practice of psychological testing in clinical services in the United States. American Psychologist, 1961, 16, 79–83.
4.
SundbergN. D.TylerL. E.Clinical practice: an introduction to research and practice. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1962.
5.
WechslerD.The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1958.
