Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Associations were obtained from 40 Ss each at National Taiwan University and the University of Maryland to words presented either vocally or in writing. The words varied in frequency of occurrence for both languages. American Ss produced more associations than the Taiwanese Ss under all conditions. In both samples number of associations increased with frequency of the stimulus words. Printed Chinese, however, enjoyed a significant advantage over spoken Chinese in evoking associations to infrequent words. This finding, which did not obtain for the English words, was attributed to (a) more frequent exposure of Taiwanese to low frequency words in print than in speech and (b) increased identifiability of infrequent Chinese words when printed. Implications for more effective communication between the two language communities were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Edwards

A. L.

Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Rinehart, 1960.

Hovland

C. I.

The effects of mass media of communication. In Lindzey

(Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1954.

Howes

A word count of spoken English. J. verb. Learn, verb. Behav., 1966, 5, 572–604.

Klapper

J. T.

The effects of mass communication. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1961.

Knower

F. H.

Experimental studies of changes in attitude: I. A study of the effect of oral argument on changes of attitude. J. soc. Psychol., 1935, 6, 315–347.

Knower

F. H.

Experimental studies of changes in attitude: II. A study of the effect of printed argument on changes in attitude. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1936, 30, 522–532.

Lee

An analysis of meanings of Chinese words. Acta psychol. Taiwanica, 1965, 7, 97–103.

McGinnies

A cross-cultural comparison of printed communication versus spoken communication in persuasion. J. Psychol., 1965, 60, 1–8.

Noble

C. E.

An analysis of meaning. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 421–430.

10.

Noble

C. E.

Meaningfulness and familiarity. In Cofer

C. N.

Musgrave

B. S.

(Eds.), Verbal behavior and learning: Problems and processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 76–119.

11.

Osgood

C. E.

Suci

G. J.

Tannenbaum

P. H.

The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Ill.: Univer. of Illinois Press, 1957.

12.

Rosenzweig

M. R.

Miller

K. M.

Comparisons of word association responses obtained in the United States, Australia and England. J. verb. Learn, verb. Behav., 1966, 5, 35–41.

13.

Schulz

R. W.

Hopkins

R. H.

Free-association responses to verbal stimuli of varying meaningfulness as a function of presentation mode. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 1968, 7, 737–745.

14.

Schulz

R. W.

Kasschau

R. A.

Serial learning as a function of meaningfulness and mode of presentation with audio and visual stimuli of equivalent duration. J. exp. Psychol., 1966, 71, 350–354.

15.

Thorndike

E. L.

Lorge

The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia Univer., 1944.

16.

Underwood

B. J.

Schulz

R. W.

Meaningfulness and verbal learning. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1960.

17.

Vicory

A. C.

Asher

J. J.

A simplified associative-frequency measure of meaningfulness in verbal learning. J. verb. Learn, verb. Behav., 1966, 5, 507–513.

18.

Williams

J. M.

Derks

P. L.

Mode of presentation and the acquisition of paired associates that differ in pronounciability and association value. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 1963, 2, 453–456.

Verbal Association by Chinese and American Students as a Function of Word Frequency and Mode of Presentation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References