An attempt was made to test Caplow's predictions concerning behavior of triad members in three different group contexts. The hypotheses received partial support, but examination of other data led to suggestions for criterion revision applicable to all studies of coalition formation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CaplowT.A theory of coalitions in the triad. American Sociological Review, 1956, 21, 489–493.
2.
CaplowT.Farther developments of a theory of coalitions in the triad. American Journal of Sociology, 1959, 64, 488–493.
3.
ChertkoffJ. M.The effects of probability of future success on coalition formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1966, 2, 265–277.
4.
ChertkoffJ. M.A revision of Caplow's coalition theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1967, 3, 172–177.
5.
GamsonW. A.A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 373–382.
6.
GamsonW. A.Experimental studies of coalition formation. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol.1. New York: Academic Press, 1964. Pp. 81–110.
7.
KelleyH. H.ArrowoodA. J.Coalitions in the triad: critique and experiment. Sociometry, 1960, 23, 231–244.
8.
McClintockC. G.McNeelS. P.Reward level and game playing behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1966, 10, 98–102.
9.
PsathasG.StrykerS.Bargaining behavior and orientations in coalition formation. Sociometry, 1965, 28, 124–144.
10.
VinackeW. E.ArkoffA.Experimental studies of coalitions in the triad. American Sociological Review, 1957, 22, 406–415.
