6 male littermate rats reared from weaning in environments of either reduced or augmented stimulus variety were compared under different conditions of motivational urgency. Tests involving high urgency—initial exposure to an open field, passive (step-down) avoidance of foot-shock, and CER acquisition—showed no differences (ps > .05). The test involving low urgency —extinction of the CER—separated the groups (p < .01).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ForgaysD. G.ForgaysJ. W.The nature of the effect of free-environmental experience in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1952, 45, 322–328.
2.
FullerJ. L.Transitory effects of experiential deprivation upon reversal learning in dogs. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 4, 273–274.
3.
FullerJ. L.Experiential deprivation and later behavior. Science, 1967, 158, 1645–1652.
4.
GillJ. H.ReidL. D.PorterP. B.Effects of restricted rearing on Lashley-stand performance. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 239–242.
5.
HebbD. O.The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley, 1949.
6.
HymovitchB.The effects of experimental variations on problem solving in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1952, 45, 313–321.
7.
MelzackR.Effects of early experience on behavior: experimental and conceptual considerations. In HochP. H.ZubinJ. (Eds.), Psychopathology of perception. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1965. Pp. 271–299.
8.
MelzackR.BurnsS. K.Neurophysiological effects of early sensory restriction. Experimental Neurology, 1965, 13, 163–175.
WoodsP. J.FiskeA. S.RuckelshausS. I.The effects of drives conflicting with exploration on the problem-solving behavior of rats reared in free and restricted environments. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1961, 54, 167–169.
