Abstract
The present study investigated the effects of dependency arousal on learning. To justify the assumption of a dependency-related drive that operates to energize, and perhaps direct, human behavior, it was necessary to establish conditions that produce dependency arousal and to demonstrate a systematic relation between arousal and behavior. This was done by defining arousal in terms of Ss predisposition (high-dependent or low-dependent) and the experimental stimulus conditions (nature of S-E interactions). Ss' behavior on specific learning tasks was predicted from Hullian-Spence theory as this theoretical system deals with the effect of drive on performance. Dependency arousal was specifically differentiated from anxiey arousal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
