Distinguishing between sex in the biological sense and sex-role or sex-identity as a reflection of culture allows room for research of psychology and psychiatrists on the subtle influences of learning in homosexuality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeachF. A.Characteristics of masculine “sex drive.” In JonesM. R. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1956. Lincoln: Univer. Nebraska Press, 1956. Pp. 1–32.
2.
BenjaminH.Clinical aspects of transsexualism in the male and female. Amer. J. Psychother., 1964, 18, 458–469.
3.
BieberI.DainH. J.DinceP. R.DrellichM. G.GrandH. G.GundlachR. H.KremerM. W.RifkinA. H.WilburC. B.BieberT. B.Homosexuality: a psychoanalytic study. New York: Vintage, 1965.
4.
BraatenL. J.DarlingC. D.Overt and covert homosexual problems among male college students. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1965, 71, 269–310.
5.
BroderickC. B.Sexual behavior among pre-adolescents. J. soc. Issues, 1966, 22, 6–21.
6.
DeanR. B.RichardsonH.Analysis of MMPI profiles of forty college educated overt male homosexuals. J. consult. Psychol., 1964, 28, 483–486.
7.
FribergR. R.Measures of homosexuality: cross-validation of two MMPI scales and implications for usage. J. consult. Psychol., 1967, 31, 88–91.
8.
GoldfriedM. P.On the diagnosis of homosexuality from the Rorschach. J. consult. Psychol., 1966, 30, 338–349.
9.
HardyK. R.An appetitional theory of sexual motivation. Psychol. Rev., 1964, 71, 1–18.
10.
KinseyA. C.PomeroyW. B.MartinC. E.Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1948.
11.
MoneyJ.Hermaphroditism. In EllisA.AbarbanelA. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of sexual behavior. New York: Hawthorn, 1961. Pp. 472–484.
12.
StollerR. J.Passing and the continuum of gender identity. In MarmorJ. (Ed.), Sexual inversion. New York: Basic Books, 1965. Pp. 190–210.
13.
StollerR. J.The mother's contribution to infantile transvestic behavior. Int. J. Psycho-anal., 1966, 47, 384–395.
ZuckerR. A.ManosevitzM.MMPI patterns of overt male homosexuals: reinterpretation and comment on Dean and Richardson's study. J. consult. Psychol., 1966, 30, 555–557.
