E in a conformity study varied his apparent status by dressing more or less informally and saying he was a student cook or a graduate school instructor. He minimized personal involvement by saying he had been hired by an outside organization to run the experiment. Ss conformed more to norms set by their peers when E was of higher status.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenV. L.Situational factors in conformity. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Pp. 133–175.
2.
CrutchfieldR. S.Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 1955, 10, 191–198.
3.
GilsonC.AbelsonR. P.The subjective use of inductive evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 301–310.
4.
OrneM. T.On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 776–783.
5.
RosenthalR.Covert communication in the psychological experiment. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 356–367.
6.
WinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
