While observing case presentations of more than a dozen behavior therapists at various stages of experience, the authors noted the inappropriate and almost indiscriminate use of desensitization methods. Various negative repercussions are described, and examples are presented of rapid change following appropriate (non-desensitization) techniques. The plea is for broad-spectrum behavior therapy as replacement for narrow S-R formulations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GelderM. G.MarksI. M.WolffH. H.ClarkeM.Desensitization and psychotherapy in the treatment of phobic states: a controlled inquiry. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1967, 113, 53–73.
2.
LangP. J.LazovikA. D.ReynoldsD. J.Desensitization, suggestibility, and pseudotherapy. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1965, 70, 395–402.
3.
LazarusA. A.Group therapy of phobic disorders by systematic desensitization. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 63, 504–510.
4.
LazarusA. A.The results of behavior therapy in 126 cases of severe neurosis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1963, 1, 69–79.
5.
LazarusA. A.Behavior rehearsal vs. non-directive therapy vs. advice in effecting behavior change. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1966, 4, 209–212. (a)
6.
LazarusA. A.Broad-spectrum behavior therapy and the treatment of agoraphobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1966, 4, 95–97. (b)
7.
MeyerV.CrispA. H.Some problems in behavior therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1966, 112, 367–381.
8.
PaulG. L.Insight vs. desensitization in psychotherapy. Stanford: Stanford Univer. Press, 1966.
9.
WolpeJ.Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford: Stanford Univer. Press, 1958.
10.
WolpeJ.The systematic desensitization treatment of neuroses. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1961, 132, 189–203.
