Food-deprived rats (n = 32) received 55 straight runway trials for 1 or 12 pellet rewards combined factorially with 0- or 20-sec. post-reinforcement delays. The 12-pellet groups were then run for an additional 55 trials at 1 pellet while the 1-pellet groups were run for 86 trials and then shifted to 12 pellets for an additional 24 trials. The result of importance was the absence of differences between delay and no-delay groups following reward reduction. These data were contrasted with effects of post-reinforcement delay on extinction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmselA.Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: some recent history and a theoretical extension. Psychol. Rev., 1962, 49, 306–328.
2.
CapaldiE. J.PoynerH.Aftereffects and delay of reward. J. exp. Psychol., 1966, 71, 80–88.
3.
CrespiL. P.Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. Amer. J. Psychol., 1942, 55, 467–517.
4.
FehrerE.Effects of amount of reinforcement and of pre- and post-reinforcement delays on learning and extinction. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 167–176.
5.
IsonJ. R.RosenA. J.On changes in incentive: some new findings and theoretical speculations. Presented at Psychonomic Society, Chicago, 1965.
6.
LindquistE. F.Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
7.
McCainG.BowenJ.Pre- and post-reinforcement delay with a small number of acquisition trials. Psychon. Sci., 1967, 7, 121–122.
