Increase and Decrease in Light and Noise Stimuli as Reinforcers for Albino Rats

Abstract

The effect upon response latencies of random increases or decreases in stimulus intensity following a barrier-crossing response in a Mowrer-Miller shuttle box was studied. Stimulus change was contingent upon the response. 32 albino rats were randomly assigned to a control group which received no stimulation and to three experimental groups: Group L (subjected to changes in light), Group N (subjected to changes in noise), and Group LN (subjected to changes in light and noise). It was found that (a) in terms of mean latencies Group LN differed significantly from Group L and the control group. (b) Although the trial effect was significant, response latency did not consistently decrease over trials. (c) The mean number of spontaneous crossings was significantly larger for Group LN than for all other groups. (d) The mean number of spontaneous crossings increased over trials.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnes

G. W.

Kish

G. B.

Behavioral effects of the cessation of weak light energy. American Psychologist, 1957, 12, 411. (Abstract)

Campbell

B. A.

The fractional reduction in noxious stimulation required to produce “just noticeable” learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1955, 48, 141–148.

Cooper

L. M.

Operant behavior as a function of stimulus complexity. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963, 56, 857–862.

Forgays

D. G.

Levin

Learning as a function of sensory stimulation of various intensities. American Psychologist, 1957, 12, 411. (Abstract)

Freeman

M. F.

Tukey

J. W.

Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1950, 21, 607–611.

Jerome

E. A.

Moody

J. A.

Connor

T. J.

Ryan

Intensity of illumination and the rate of responding in a multiple-door situation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1958, 51, 47–49.

Kaplan

The effects of noxious stimulus intensity and duration during intermittent reinforcement of escape behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1952, 45, 538–549.

Keller

F. S.

Light aversion in the white rat. Psychological Record, 1941, 4, 235–250.

Kish

G. B.

Learning when the onset of illumination is used as reinforcing stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1955, 48, 261–264.

10.

Marx

M. H.

Henderson

R. L.

Roberts

C. L.

Positive reinforcement of the bar-pressing response by a light stimulus following dark operant pretests with no aftereffect. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1955, 48, 73–76.

11.

Morris

J. B.

Crowder

W. F.

Crowder

T. H.

Stimulus variations and weak light reinforcements. Psychological Reports, 1961, 8, 290.

12.

Robinson

J. W.

Light as a reinforcer for bar pressing in rats as a function of adaption illumination level and direction of light change. American Psychologist, 1957, 12, 411. (Abstract)

13.

Robinson

J. W.

Light onset and termination as reinforcers for the rats living under normal light conditions. Psychlogical Reports, 1959, 5, 793–796.