The transfer paradigms discussed by Thompson may be useful in testing the combined effects of Houston- and Osgood-types of similarities, but it is a mistake to state that either surface, by itself, predicts over-all transfer in these situations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DallettK. M.The transfer surface re-examined. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 1962, 1, 91–94.
2.
HoustonJ. P.Verbal transfer and interlist similarities. Psychol. Rev., 1964, 71, 412–414.
3.
HoustonJ. P.Supplementary report: transfer as a function of the similarity between first-list stimuli and second-list responses. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 1966, 5, 322–323. (a)
4.
HoustonJ. P.Verbal transfer as a function of S1-R2 and S2-R1 interlist similarity. J. exp. Psychol., 1966, 71, 232–235. (b)
5.
OsgoodC. E.The similarity paradox in human learning: a resolution. Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 132–143.
6.
ThompsonC. P.On the incompatibility of the Houston and Osgood transfer surfaces. Psychol. Rev., 1966, 73, 586–588.
