Four arguments are derived from past research and presented to stimulate new inquiry on the meaning of intensity as a variable in attitude measurement. The tentative hypothesis is proposed that intensity is an imperfect indicator of the direction of an attitude.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergI. A.The deviation hypothesis: a broad statement of its assumptions and postulates. In BergI. A. (Ed.), Response set in personality assessment. Chicago: Aldine, 1967. Pp. 3–15.
2.
EhrlichH. J.Instrument error and the study of prejudice. Social Forces, 1964, 43, 197–206.
3.
KomoritaS. S.Attitude content, intensity, and the neutral point on a Likert scale. Journal of Social Psychology, 1963, 61, 327–334.
4.
KornH. A.GiddanN. S.Scoring methods and construct validity of the dogmatism scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1964, 24, 867–874.
5.
MurphvG.LikertR.Public opinion and the individual. New York: Harper, 1938.
6.
PeabodyD.Two components in bipolar scales: direction and extremeness. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 65–73.
7.
RokeachM.NorrellG.Analysis, synthesis, and academic performance. East Lansing: Michigan State Univer., 1966. (Final Rep. of Coop. Res. Branch Proj. No. 879)
8.
RundquistE. A.SlettoR. F.Personality in the depression. Minneapolis: Univer. Minnesota Press, 1936.
