The extent to which differences in word associations between cultural groups are due to linguistic factors or to word meanings and values determined by culture was examined in the continued free word associations of Koreans in Korean and in English and a U. S. group in English. The influence of cultural background was at least as much as that of language on each of three characteristics examined. Further, much of the difference due to language seems to stem from the milieu of language acquisition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BousfieldW. A.The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of Social Psychology, 1953, 49, 229–240.
2.
CohenB. H.BousfieldW. A.WhitmarshG. A.Cultural norms for verbal items in 43 categories. Univer. of Connecticut, Technical Report No. 22, August 1957.
3.
DeeseJ.The structure of association in language and thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1965.
JungJ. G.The association method. American Journal of Psychology, 1910, 21, 219–269.
6.
KentG. H.RosanoffA. J.A study of associations in insanity. American Journal of Insanity, 1910, 67, 37–96, 317–390.
7.
LambertW. E.HavelkaJ.CrosbyC.Influence of language-acquisition of contents on bilingualism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958, 56, 239–244.
8.
OsgoodC.The Koreans and their culture. New York: Ronald, 1951.
9.
SzalayL. B.Cultural meaning and values: a method of empirical assessment. Washington, D. C.: SORO, The American Univer., 1965.
10.
SzalayL. B.BrentJ. E.The analysis of cultural meanings through free verbal associations. Journal of Social Psychology, 1967, 72, 161–187.
