Discussions of systematic desensitization have used learning terms loosely. This limits the usefulness of the learning concepts being applied in behavior therapy. It also impedes development of learning theory because of the lack of distinction in these discussions among possible explanations of the extinction effect of systematic desensitization and the arrangement of conditions likely to produce or facilitate such an effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanduraA.Psychotherapy as a learning process. Psychological Bulletin, 1961, 58, 144–159.
2.
DavisonG. C.Systematic desensitization as a counterconditioning process. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1967, in press.
3.
EysenckH. J.An editorial note on reciprocal inhibition. In EysenckH. J. (Ed.), Experiments in behaviour therapy. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1964. Pp. 19–20.
4.
GaleD. S.SturmfelsG.GaleE. N.A comparison of reciprocal inhibition and experimental extinction in the psychotherapeutic process. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1966, 4, 149–155.
5.
GuthrieE. R.The psychology of learning. New York: Harper, 1935.
6.
HullC. L.Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century, 1943.
7.
KimbleG. A.Hilgard and Marquis' Conditioning and learning. London: Methuen, 1961.
8.
LomontJ. F.Reciprocal inhibition or extinction?Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1965, 3, 209–219.
9.
LomontJ. F.EdwardsJ. E.The role of relaxation in systematic desensitization. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1967, 5, 11–25.
10.
MarxM. H.The need for more specific formulations of the “competing-response” interpretation of extinction. Psychological Reports, 1963, 12, 729–730.
SmithS.GuthrieE. R.General psychology in terms of behavior. New York: Appleton, 1921.
17.
WolpeJ.Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford: Stanford Univer. Press, 1958.
18.
WolpeJ.The experimental foundations of some new psychotherapeutic methods. In BachrachA. J. (Ed.), Experimental foundations of clinical psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1962. Pp. 554–575.
