The effects of difficulty level, type of content, and temporal position of knowledge of results were considered relative to the retention of empirically-derived verbal materials by 160 college Ss. Difficulty level appeared to be the only variable which was operative to a significant extent for the specified learning task.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmmonsR. B.Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. J. gen. Psychol., 1956, 54, 279–290.
2.
AngellG. W.The effect of immediate knowledge of quiz results on final examination scores in freshman chemistry. J. educ. Res., 1949, 42, 391–394.
3.
BrackbillY.AdamsG.ReaneyT. P.A parametric study of the delay-retention effect. Psychol. Rep., 1967, 20, 433–434.
4.
BrackbillY.BravosA.StarrR. H.Delay-improved retention of a difficult task. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 947–952.
5.
BrackbillY.IsaacsR. B.SmelkinsonM.Delay of reinforcement and the retention of unfamiliar meaningless material. Psychol. Rep., 1962, 11, 553–554.
6.
BrackbillY.KappyM. S.Delay of reinforcement and retention. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 14–18.
7.
BrackbillY.WagnerJ. E.WilsonD.Feedback delay and the teaching machine. Psychol. Schools, 1964, 1, 148–156.
8.
HaagenC. H.Synonymity, vividness, familiarity and association value ratings of 400 pairs of common adjectives. J. Psychol., 1949, 27, 453–463.
9.
LandsmanH. J.TurkewitzM.Delay of knowledge of results and performance on a cognitive task. Psychol. Rep., 1962, 11, 66.
10.
MorganC.MorganL.Effects of immediate awareness of success and failure upon objective examination scores. J. exp. Educ., 1935, 4, 63–66.
11.
NobleC. E.An analysis of meaning. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 421–430.
12.
PaigeD.Learning while testing. J. educ. Res., 1966, 59, 276–277.
13.
RennerK.Delay of reinforcement: A historical review. Psychol. Bull., 1964, 61, 341–361.
