Rosenthal (1967a, 1967b) in the most recent of a series of interchanges over a study by Ingraham and Harrington (1966) points up residual differences in interpretation. These differences remain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HarringtonG. M.IngrahamL. H.Psychology of the scientist: XXV. Experimenter bias and tails of Pascal. Psychological Reports, 1967, 21, 513–516.
2.
IngrahamL. H.HarringtonG. M.Psychology of the scientist: XVI. Experience of E as a variable in reducing experimenter bias. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 455–461.
3.
RosenthalR.Psychology of the scientist: XXVI. Experimenter expectancy, one tale of Pascal, and the distribution of three tails. Psychological Reports, 1967, 21, 517–520. (a)
4.
RosenthalR.Psychology of the scientist: XXIII. Experimenter expectancy, experimenter experience, and Pascal's wager. Psychological Reports, 1967, 20, 619–622. (b)
