An iterative factor analysis was performed on the scores obtained from a Motivational Adjective Check List (MACL) (N = 100 undergraduate male students). The initial matrix of significant factors was rotated according to the quartimax, varimax, and equamax procedures. The promax rotation was, then, performed on each of the three orthogonal solutions. Interpretation of factors was based on the promax solution of the equamax rotation. The factors obtained were integrativeness, striving, poise, and independence.
BarronF.Some relationships between originality and style of personality. American Psychologist, 1952, 9, 326.
3.
BarronF.The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 51, 478–485.
4.
BarronF.Originality in relation to personality and intellect. Journal of Personality, 1957, 25, 730–742.
5.
BloomS. S.Studies of creative versus non-creative individuals. In TaylorC. W. (Ed.), Research Conference on the Identification of Creative Scientific Talent. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press, 1955. Pp. 183–184.
6.
CattellR. B.The description of personality: 2. Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1943, 38, 476–507.
7.
CattellR. B.Description and measurement of personality. Yonkers-on-Hudson, N. Y.: World Book, 1946.
8.
DrevdahlJ. E.Factors of importance for creativity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1956, 12, 21–26.
9.
GoughH. G.The Adjective Check List as a personality assessment research technique. Psychological Reports, 1960, 6, 107–122.
10.
GuilfordJ. P.Creativity. American Psychologist, 1950, 5, 444–454.
11.
GuilfordJ. P.Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 110–118.
12.
HartshorneH.MayM. A.Studies in the nature of character: III. Studies in the organization of character. New York: Macmillan, 1930.
13.
HathawayS. R.MeehlP. E.The MMPI in military clinical psychology. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1951. Pp. 71–111. (Dept. of the Army Technical Manual TM 8-242, Dept. of the Air Force Manual AFM 160-45)
14.
HendricksonA. E.WhiteP. O.Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1964, 17, 65–70.
15.
HollandJ. L.The prediction of achievement in different college environments. Paper read at the American Psychological Association convention, Philadelphia, 1963.
16.
HollandJ. L.NicholsR. C.Prediction of academic and extracurricular achievement in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964, 55, 55–65.
17.
KaiserH. F.The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 187–200.
18.
MacKinnonD. W.What do we mean by talent and how do we test for it? In College Entrance Examination Board, The search for talent. New York: CEEB, 1960. Pp. 20–29.
19.
SaundersD. R.An analytic method for rotation to orthogonal simple structure. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1953. (Res. Bull.53–10)
20.
SaundersD. R.Trans-varimax: Some properties of the ratiomax and equamax criteria for blind orthogonal rotation. Paper read at the American Psychological Association Convention, St. Louis, 1962.
21.
SciortinoR.Personality and creative abilities. (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State Univer.) Columbus, O.: Univer. Microfilms, 1963. (No. 64-6958)
22.
TaylorC. W.SmithW. R.GhiselinB.EllisonB.Explorations in the measurement and prediction of contributions of one sample of scientists. USAF ASD Tech. Rep., 1961, No. 61–96.
