The concept of compatibility, as applied to marriage, is criticized for mixing evaluation with description, for referring to many heterogeneous phenomena, and for not corresponding to any major distinctions among kinds of couples. It is also suggested that use of compatibility as a concept tends to encourage a particular set of marriage ideals, notably including the idea that marriage is a task to be accomplished as coolly and scientifically as possible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BricklinB.GottliebS. G.The prediction of some aspects of marital compatibility by means of the Rorschach test. Psychiat. Quart. Suppl., 1961, 35, 281–303.
2.
CuberJ. F.HarroffP. B.The significant Americans. New York: Appleton-Century, 1965.
3.
GoodrichD. W.RyderR. G.RaushH. L.Patterns of newlywed marriage. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Atlantic City, N. J., 1966.
4.
MursteinB. J.GlaudinV.The relationship of marital adjustment to personality: A factor analysis of the interpersonal check list. J. Marriage & Family, 1966, 28, 37–43.
5.
RyderR. G.The factualizing game: A sickness of psychological research. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 563–570.
6.
RyderR. G.FlintA. A.Vicissitudes of marital disputes: The Object Matching Test. Presented at the American Orthopsychiatric Association meeting in St. Louis, Missouri, 1966.
7.
SchutzW. C.FIRO; a three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960.
8.
TermanL. M.ButtenweiserP.Personality factors in marital compatibility. J. soc. Psychol., 1935, 6, 143–171.
9.
YollesS.How to get more fun out of life. Family Circle, 1966, 68(4), 29, 88–90.
