The effects of verbal reinforcement on word-association responding were investigated in combination with pre-experimental tendencies for common or uncommon responses. Although effective in all combinations, reinforcement tended to be most effective when coinciding with pre-experimental tendencies. Neither variable was related to subsequent performance on the Remote Associates Test.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CaronA. J.UngerS. M.ParloffM. B.A test of Maltzman's theory of originality training. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963, 1, 436–442.
2.
DollardJ.MillerN. E.Personality and psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.
3.
MaltzmanI.BelloniM.FishbeinM.Experimental studies of associative variables in originality. Psychological Monographs, 1964, 78, No. 3 (Whole No. 580).
4.
MaltzmanK.BogartzW.BergerL.A procedure for increasing word association originality and its transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 56, 392–398.
5.
MaltzmanI.SimonS.RaskinD.LichtL.Experimental studies in the training of originality. Psychological Monographs, 1960, 74, No. 6 (Whole No. 493).
6.
MednickS. A.The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 220–232.
7.
MednickS. A.MednickM. T.The associative basis of the creative process. U. S. Dept of Hlth, Ed. & Wel., Coop. Res. Proj. No. 1073, Univer. Michigan, 1965.
8.
PalermoD. S.JenkinsJ. J.Word association norms; grade school through college. Minneapolis: Univer. of Minnesota Press, 1964.
9.
RosenbaumM. E.ArensonS. J.PanmanR. A.Training and instructions in the facilitation of originality. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1964, 3, 50–56.
10.
SimonS.DitrichsR.JamisonN.Vicarious learning of common and uncommon associations in children. Psychonomic Science, 1965, 3, 345–346.