When two mildly mentally retarded adolescent girls were reinforced for concurrent performance on two manipulanda by two independent variable-interval schedules, one for each manipulandum, the performance of the retardates was positively related to the amount of reinforcement. This finding confirms Catania's (1963) finding with pigeons and adds to the growing list of studies demonstrating the effects of operant techniques in modifying human behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BruningJ. L.Effects of magnitude of reward and percentage of reinforcements on a lever movement response. Child Development, 1964, 34, 281–285.
2.
CantorG. N.HottelJ. V.Discrimination learning in mental defectives as a function of magnitude of food reward and intelligence level. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1955–1956, 60, 380–384.
3.
CataniaA. C.Concurrent performance: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963, 6, 299–300.
4.
CrespiL. P.Amount of reinforcement and level of performance. Psychological Review, 1944, 51, 341–357.
5.
EllisN. R.Amount of reward and operant behavior in mental defectives. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1962, 66, 595–599.
6.
FersterC. B.SkinnerB. F.Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
7.
HeberR. F.Motor task performance of high grade mentally retarded males as a function of the magnitude of incentive. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1959, 63, 667–671.
8.
HerrnsteinR. J.Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961, 4, 267–272.
9.
PubolsB. H.Jr.Incentive magnitude, learning, and performance in animals. Psychological Bulletin, 1960, 57, 89–115.
10.
SidmanM.Operant techniques. In BachrachA. J. (Ed.), Experimental foundations of clinical psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1962. Pp. 170–210.
11.
ZeamanD.Response latency as a function of the amount of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949, 39, 466–483.
