Conflicting evidence related to the effect of amphetamine in avoidance conditioning is noted. Although a “freezing reduction” hypothesis has been most widely employed to explain the facilitating effect of the drug in such conditioning, the need for expanding the hypothesis to include consideration of the interaction of the drug with experimental conditions and the effect of the drug on bodily activity is suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarryH.IIIMillerN. E.Comparison of drug effects on approach, avoidance, and escape motivation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1965, 59, 18–24.
2.
ColeS. O.Interaction of amphetamine with conditions of food deprivation. Psychol. Rep., 1963, 13, 387–390.
3.
ColeS. O.Further study of interactive effects of amphetamine and food deprivation. Psychol. Rep., 1965, 16, 625–630.
4.
ColeS. O.Increased suppression of food intake by amphetamine in rats with anterior hypothalamic lesions. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1966, 61, 302–305.
5.
HearstE.WhalenR. E.Facilitating effects of d-amphetamine on discriminated-avoidance performance. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1963, 56, 124–128.
6.
KrieckhausE. E.Decrements in avoidance behavior following mammillothalamic tractotomy in rats and subsequent recovery with d-amphetamine. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1965, 60, 31–35.
7.
KrieckhausE. E.MillerN. E.ZimmermanP.Reduction of freezing behavior and improvement of shock-avoidance by d-amphetamine. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1965, 60, 36–40.
8.
PowellB. J.MartinL. K.KamanoD. K.Failure to find improved shuttlebox avoidance performance using d-amphetamine sulfate. Psychol. Rep., 1965, 17, 330.
9.
SteinL.Facilitation of avoidance behavior by positive brain stimulation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1965, 60, 9–19.
