Within each of 18 classrooms, an average of 20% of the children were reported to classroom teachers as showing unusual potential for intellectual gains. Eight months later these “unusual” children (who had actually been selected at random) showed significantly greater gains in IQ than did the remaining children in the control group. These effects of teachers' expectancies operated primarily among the younger children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FlanaganJ. C.Tests of general ability: technical report. Chicago, Ill.: Science Research Associates, 1960.
2.
RosenthalR.The effect of the experimenter on the results of psychological research. In MaherB. A. (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research. Vol. I. New York: Academic Press, 1964. Pp. 79–114.
3.
RosenthalR.Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleron-Century-Crofts, in press.
4.
RosenthalR.FodeK. L.The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat. Behavioral Science, 1963, 8, 183–189.
5.
RosenthalR.LawsonR.A longitudinal study of the effects of experimenter bias on the operant learning of laboratory rats. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1964, 2, 61–72.
