Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Trial spacing was studied over 120 acquisition trials and 20 each of extinction, reacquisition, and re-extinction, using five intertrial intervals from 40 sec. to 120 min. in between four daily trials. Throughout acquisition, performance of the 120-min. group increased throughout the course of a daily block, while the others first increased, then decreased. Spontaneous regression persisted throughout acquisition. Extinction performance was not systematically related to trial spacing, and no evidence for spontaneous recovery was found. Changes in measured spatial variability in the alley indexed learning but did not differentiate trial spacing effects. The results generally failed to confirm qualitative hypotheses about trial spacing derived from statistical learning theory.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. A.

The second facet of forgetting; a review of warmup decrement. Psychol. Bull., 1961, 58, 257–273.

Ammons

R. B.

Acquisition of motor skill: 1. Quantitative analysis and theoretical formulation. Psychol. Rev., 1947, 45, 263–281.

Ammons

R. B.

Willig

Acquisition of motor skill: IV. Effects of repeated periods of massed practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 118–126.

Birch

Extended training extinction effect under massed and spaced extinction trials. J. exp. Psychol., 1965, 70, 315–322.

Cotton

J. W.

Lewis

D. J.

Effects of intertrial interval on acquisition and extinction of a running response. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 54, 15–21.

Dunnett

C. W.

A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Amer. Statist. Assn, 1955, 50, 1096–1121.

Estes

W. K.

Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychol. Rev., 1955, 62, 369–377. (a)

Estes

W. K.

Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychol. Rev., 1955, 62, 145–154. (b)

Estes

W. K.

Lauer

D. W.

Conditions of invariance and modifiability in simple reversal learning. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1957, 50, 199–206.

10.

Fozard

J. L.

Acquisition and extinction of an instrumental running response under different intertrial intervals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh Univer., 1961.

11.

Hill

W. F.

Erlebacher

Spear

N. E.

Reminiscence and forgetting in the runway. J. exp. Psychol., 1965, 70, 201–209.

12.

Homme

L. E.

Spontaneous recovery and statistical learning theory. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 205–212.

13.

Lauer

D. W.

Carterette

T. S.

Changes in response measures over repeated acquisitions and extinctions of a running habit. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1957, 50, 334–338.

14.

Lewis

D. J.

Cotton

J. W.

Effect of runway size and drive strength on acquisition and extinction. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 59, 402–408.

15.

Logan

F. A.

Incentive. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1960.

16.

Maltzman

The process need. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 40–48.

17.

McConnell

Spontaneous regression and recovery in a sequence of discrimination periods. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 121–129.

18.

Ryan

T. A.

Multiple comparisons in psychological research. Psychol. Bull., 1959, 56, 26–47.

19.

Verplanck

W. S.

The development of discrimination in a simple locomotor habit. J. exp. Psychol., 1942, 31, 441–464.

20.

Weinstock

Symposium on partial reinforcement. Paper read at Midwest Psychol. Assn in Detroit, April, 1957.

Trial Spacing in Instrumental Running

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References