Five rhesus monkeys were tested under two methods of meassuring reinforcer preference, one a paired-comparison and the other an operant-rate technique. Most animals failed to learn the discriminations necessary for paired-comparisons but showed significant and reliable differences in preference for the commodities evaluated by the operant-rate technique. It was concluded that either method, when appropriately designed, may yield useful results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HarlowH. F.MeyerD. R.Paired-comparisons scales for monkey rewards. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1952, 45, 73–79.
2.
MeyerD. R.PolidoraV. J.McConnellD. G.Effects of spatial S-R contiguity and response delay upon discriminative performances by monkeys. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1961, 54, 175–177.
3.
PolidoraV. J.SchneiderI. J.Preferences of monkeys for automatically dispensable rewards. Psychol. Rep., 1964, 15, 55–64.
4.
TreichlerF. R.HorelJ. A.MeyerD. R.An assessment of automatically dispensed primate reinforcers. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1962, 5, 537–539.
5.
WarrenJ. M.Effects of satiation on food preference in monkeys. J. genet. Psychol., 1958, 93, 33–36.
6.
WunderlichR. A.DorffJ. E.Contiguity relationships of stimulus, response, and reward as determinants of discrimination difficulty. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1965, 59, 147–149.
