4 groups of 20 Ss were given 100 classical eyelid conditioning trials on each of five days. The groups formed a 2 × 2 design with CS Intensity and Room Illumination as the factors involved. Results showed: (1) an increase in CRs over days with more rapid conditioning in the dimmer room; (2) consistent decreases in CRs within sessions, more apparent with the dimmer CS; (3) consistent decreases in latency over trials within a session; and (4) over-all higher performance with the brighter CS.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EbelH. C.ProkasyW. F.Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 65, 52–58.
PerkinsC. C.Jr.The relation between conditioned stimulus intensity and response strength. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 225–231.
6.
ProkasyW. F.EbelH. C.ThompsonD. D.Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 66, 138–141.
7.
ProkasyW. F.WhaleyF. L.Intertrial interval range shift in classical eyelid conditioning. Psychol. Rep., 1963, 12, 55–58.
8.
RunquistW. N.MuirW. R.Intrasession decrements in the performance of the classically conditioned eyelid reflex. J. exp. Psychol., 1965, in press.