83 Ss were run in two experiments involving delay of shock termination. In the first, shock was terminated a brief interval after a shock-escape response, while in the second, only responses occurring a brief interval after shock onset were effective in terminating it. Although both procedures were designed to facilitate avoidance acquisition by minimizing freezing behavior, in both cases the use of delay led to decrements in acquisition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChapmanJ. A.BollesR. C.Effect of UCS duration on classical avoidance learning of the bar-press response. Psychol. Rep., 1964, 14, 559–563.
2.
FeldmanR. S.BremnerF. J.A method for rapid conditioning of stable avoidance bar pressing behavior. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1963, 6, 393–394.