This paper explored common objections to cognitive dissonance theory, propositions within the theory that have been neglected by critics, and issues within social psychology that have been sharpened by debate over dissonance theory. It is concluded that the theory elaborates one important class of quasi-logical constraints on thought processes, psychological implication, and that dissonance research is moving beyond demonstrations to more crucial issues such as exposure to information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelsonP.Bigotry in science. Science, 1964, 144, 371.
2.
AdamsJ. S.Toward an understanding of inequity. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1963, 67, 422–436.
3.
AdamsJ. S.JacobsenP. R.Effects of wage inequities on work quality. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1964, 69, 19–25.
4.
AdamsJ. S.RosenbaumW. B.The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities. J. appl. Psychol., 1962, 46, 161–164.
5.
AronsonE.CarlsmithJ. M.Performance expectancy as a determinant of actual performance. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1962, 65, 178–182.
6.
AronsonE.MillsJ.The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1959, 59, 177–181.
7.
AschS. E.Cacophonophobia. Con temp. Psychol., 1958, 3, 194–195.
8.
BoringE. G.Psychologist at large. New York: Basic Books, 1961.
9.
BramelD.A dissonance theory approach to defensive projection. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1962, 64, 121–129.
10.
BrehmJ. W.CohenA. R.Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York: Wiley, 1962.
11.
BrockT. C.Effects of prior dishonesty on postdecision dissonance. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1963, 66, 325–331.
12.
CanonL. K.Self-confidence and selective exposure to information. In FestingerL. (Ed.), Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford: Stanford Univer. Press, 1964. Pp. 83–95.
13.
ChapanisN. P.ChapanisA.Cognitive dissonance: five years later. Psychol. Bull., 1964, 61, 1–22.
14.
CohenA. R.Attitudinal consequences of induced discrepancies between cognitions and behavior. Publ. opin. Quart., 1960, 24, 297–318.
15.
CohenA. R.BrehmJ. W.FlemingW. H.Attitude change and justification for compliance. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 56, 276–278.
16.
DavisK. E.JonesE. E.Changes in interpersonal perceptions as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 61, 402–410.
17.
FeatherN. T.Cognitive dissonance, sensitivity, and evaluation. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1963, 66, 157–163.
18.
FestingerL.A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford Univer. Press, 1957.
HovlandC. I.Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. Amer. Psychol., 1959, 14, 8–17.
21.
JordonN.The mythology of the non-obvious: autism or fact. Contemp. Psychol., 1964, 9, 140–142.
22.
KatzD.StotlandE.A preliminary statement to a theory of attitude structure and change. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: a study of a science.Vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 423–475.
23.
KnightK. E.Effect of effort on behavioral rigidity in a Luchins water jar task. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1963, 66, 190–192.
24.
LachmanR.The model in theory construction. In MarxM. (Ed.), Theories in contemporary psychology. New York: Macmillan, 1963. Pp. 78–89.
25.
LawrenceD. H.FestingerL.Deterrents and reinforcements. Stanford: Stanford Univer. Press, 1962.
26.
McGuireW. J.Cognitive consistency and attitude change. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, 345–353.
27.
MillerG. A.Psychology: the science of mental life. New York: Harper, 1962.
28.
PepitoneA.Attraction and hostility. New York: Atherton, 1964.
29.
RosenbergM. J.Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 53, 367–372.
30.
RosenbergM. J.When dissonance fails: on elimination of evaluation apprehension from attitude measurement. J. Pers. & soc. Psychol., 1965, 1, 28–42.
31.
SchachterS.The psychology of affiliation. Stanford: Stanford Univer. Press, 1959.
32.
ScottW. A.Conceptualizing and measuring structural properties of cognition. In HarveyO. J. (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction. New York: Ronald, 1963. Pp. 266–288.
33.
SherifM.Conformity-deviation, norms, and groups relations. In BergI. A.BassB. M. (Eds.), Conformity and deviation. New York: Harper, 1961. Pp. 159–198.
34.
WalsterE.The temporal sequence of post-decision processes. In FestingerL. (Ed.), Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univer. Press, 1964. Pp. 112–127.
35.
WeickK. E.Reduction of cognitive dissonance through task enhancement and effort expenditure. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1964, 68, 533–539.
