Groups learning paired-associates by either the anticipation or non-anticipation method were given a single test after 6 trials and then 5 more tests in series after 9 trials. No differences between learning methods were obtained on either initial testing or the recall series. The results confirm previous findings that the methods yield equivalent learning, suggesting that informational feedback is unnecessary for verbal associative formation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CookJ. O.SpitzerM. E.Supplementary report: prompting vs confirmation in paired-associate learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 59, 275–276.
2.
PetersonL. R.BrewerC. I.Confirmation, correction, and contiguity. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 1963, 1, 365–371.
3.
ReynoldsJ. H.Effects of non-anticipation and anticipation procedures upon paired-associate learning in unmixed and mixed list designs. Psychol. Rep., 1964, 15, 795–801.
4.
RichardsonJ.GropperM. S.Learning during recall trials. Psychol. Rep., 1964, 15, 551–560.