Abstract
Radically new ideas typically meet with irrational opposition in all fields of thought, including science. As a result, progress is slowed down and some ideas need to be rediscovered before they become widely accepted. Two examples are cited from the recent psychological literature: an extensive review of the role of muscle tension in personality theory failed to acknowledge Wilhelm Reich's major contributions; and a study of the personality of cancer patients failed to credit Reich's earlier work, although almost identical conclusions were reached.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
