It was found that increasing stimulus availability by manipulating stimulus meaning and frequency, increased the manifestations of backward association (Exp. I). In Exp. II, to determine whether increased stimulus availability increased backward association as a performance phenomenon or whether the backward associative bond was actually strengthened, results were indeterminate because over-all interference effects were obtained. It was concluded that stimulus availability was only one contributor to backward association and must be considered in relation to the strength of the forward associative bond, method of test, and test-list context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AschS. E.EbenholtzS. M.The principle of associative symmetry. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., 1962, 106, 135–163.
2.
CerasoJ.An experimental critique of competition of response and specific interference as factors in retroactive inhibition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New School for Social Research, 1959.
3.
FeldmanS. M.UnderwoodB. J.Stimulus recall following paired associate learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 11–15.
4.
HuntR. G.Meaningfulness and articulation of stimulus and response in paired associate learning and stimulus recall. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 262–267.
5.
JantzE. M.UnderwoodB. J.R-S learning as a function of meaningfulness and degree of S-R learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 56, 174–179.
6.
MorikawaY.Functions of stimulus and response in paired-associates verbal learning. Psychologia, 1959, 2, 41–56.
7.
MurdockB. B.Jr.‘Backward’ learning in paired-associates. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 213–215.
8.
TwedtH. M.UnderwoodB. J.Mixed vs unmixed lists in transfer studies. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 58, 111–116.
9.
WeissE.Backward association in paired associate learning: a test of stimulus availability theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New School for Social Research, 1963.
