Various explanations have been given of the relationships between S's own attitude and the category judgments he makes when constructing a Thurstone attitude scale. This study shows that variables other than own attitude are relevant, in particular, S's level of information about the issue. The number of ‘anchors’ he uses for his judgments and the logical form of the opinion statements should also be considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HovlandC. I.SherifM.Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: item displacement in Thurstone scales. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 822–832.
2.
ManisM.The interpretation of opinion statements as a function of recipient attitude. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, 340–344.
3.
SegallM. H.The effect of attitude and experience on judgments of controversial statements. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1959, 58, 61–68.
4.
ThurstoneL. L.ChaveE. J.The measurement of attitude. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1929.
5.
UpshawH. S.Own attitude as an anchor in equal-appearing intervals. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1962, 64, 85–96.
6.
VolkmannJ.Scales of judgment and their implications for social psychology. In RohrerJ. H.SherifM. (Eds.), Social psychology at the cross-roads. New York: Harper, 1951. Pp. 273–294.
