The relative efficiency of learning under the correction and rerun noncorrection methods was studied in 2 experiments. In both experiments, rats first acquired, and then reversed, a position response in a parallel alley maze. The results of Exp. I and II showed no difference between training methods during acquisition. However, the rerun noncorrection method was superior to the correction method in a series of six position reversals in Exp. II. In view of the results of previous research on this problem, it was tentatively concluded that the superiority of one method over the other during acquisition depends on the nature of the task.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeschN. F.MorrisH.LevineS.A comparison between correction and noncorrection methods in drive discrimination. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 65, 414–419.
2.
BlodgettH. C.McCutchanK.Choice point behavior in the white rat as influenced by spatial opposition and by preceding maze sequence. J. comp. Psychol., 1944, 37, 51–70.
3.
EdwardsA. C.Experimental design in psychological research. (2nd ed.) New York: Rinehart, 1960.
4.
HullC. L.SpenceK. W.“Correction” vs. “non-correction” methods of trial-and-error learning in rats. J. comp. Psychol., 1938, 25, 127–145.
5.
KalishD.The non-correction method and the delayed response problem of Blodgett and McCutchan. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1946, 39, 91–108.
6.
MuenzingerK. F.Concerning the effect of shock for right responses in visual discrimination learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 201–203.
7.
MuenzingerK. F.PowloskiR. F.Motivation in learning: X. Comparison of electric shock for correct turns in a corrective and non-corrective situation. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 118–124.
8.
NorthA. J.Improvement in successive discrimination reversals. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1950, 43, 442–460. (a)
9.
NorthA. J.Performance during an extended series of discrimination reversals. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1950, 43, 461–470. (b)
10.
SewardJ. P.An experimental analysis of maze discrimination. J. comp. Psychol., 1943, 35, 17–27.
11.
TolmanE. C.RitchieB. F.KalishD.Studies in spatial learning: V. Response learning vs. place learning by the non-correction method. J. exp. Psychol., 1947, 37, 285–292.
12.
WischnerG. J.The effect of punishment on discrimination learning in a non-correction situation. J. exp. Psychol., 1947, 37, 271–284.
