The present experiment was conducted to test the energizing effects of frustration by blocking a learned instrumental response. 20 albino rats deprived of food, ran 4 trials a day for 24 days in an apparatus having 2 runways in series separated by a blocking door. During 2 of the 4 daily trials, the animals were momentarily blocked from running into the second runway. An analysis of their second runway performance indicated that their running time on the frustrative blocked trials was significantly less than on the non-blocked trials. The results are considered as substantiating the frustrative interruption hypothesis deduced from Brown and Farber's theory of frustration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmselA.RousselJ.Motivational properties of frustration: I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 363–368.
2.
BowerG. H.The influence of graded reductions in reward and prior frustrating events upon the magnitude of the frustration effect. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 582–587.
3.
BrownJ. S.FarberI. E.Emotions conceptualized as intervening variables—with suggestions toward a theory of frustration. Psychol. Bull., 1951, 48, 465–495.
4.
LindquistE. F.Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
5.
McHoseJ. H.Effect of continued non-reinforcement on the frustration effect. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 65, 444–450.
6.
WagnerA. R.The role of reinforcement and non-reinforcement in an “apparent frustration effect.”J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 130–136.
7.
WistE. R.Amount, delay, and position of delay of reinforcement as parameters of runway performance. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 160–166.
